Innovation portfolio selection model for the development of digitalizing industrial enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19371394Keywords:
innovation development, digital transformation, managerial decisions, digital maturity, innovation portfolio, industrial enterprise.Abstract
In the context of industrial digital transformation, innovation development is no longer a linear process but becomes a dynamic capability of enterprises to strategically adapt, learn, and evolve. This shift requires not only the deployment of digital technologies but also a fundamental rethinking of managerial approaches, decision-making structures, and internal mechanisms for knowledge accumulation. At the same time, due to limited resources and low R&D intensity in the Ukrainian economy, firms often face significant uncertainty when making innovation-related decisions and lack structured methodologies to guide them. Existing theoretical literature emphasizes the importance of organizational learning [3, 5], digital readiness [4], innovation portfolio management [6], and the capacity to absorb and apply external knowledge over time. These factors highlight the need for tailored decision-support tools that not only assess individual initiatives but also shape coherent innovation portfolios aligned with long-term strategic goals.
To solve this problem, the author’s Decision Support Model for Innovation Development (DSM-ID) is introduced. The methodology integrates digital transformation logic, enterprise readiness diagnostics, multi-criteria evaluation, and portfolio-based decision-making. The methodology consists of the following core components: (1) assessment of digital and organizational readiness, (2) construction of a strategic development trajectory, (3) initiative evaluation based on five criteria – transformational effect, internal capability gain, economic feasibility, implementation risk, and digital readiness match, (4) formation of a balanced innovation portfolio, and (5) incorporation of data-driven learning mechanisms. The methodology is illustrated using a scenario involving a representative Ukrainian machine-building enterprise with a limited investment budget and moderate digital maturity. The findings suggest that a strategy combining short-term economic gains with investments in digital infrastructure can effectively support both immediate performance and long-term innovation transformation. The study opens avenues for further empirical research, particularly in validating evaluation criteria, tailoring the methodology to different industries, and enhancing performance indicators.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Денис Євгенович Солодков, Наталя Євгеніївна Гришко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.