Intelligent systems for planning and optimizing enterprise business processes

Authors

  • Serhii Lopatka Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Enterprise Economics and Information Technologies, Lviv University of Business and Law, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7941-368X
  • Oksana Lopatka Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Enterprise Economics and Information Technologies, Lviv University of Business and Law, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7501-5022

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19124239

Keywords:

intelligent systems; business processes; planning; optimization; process mining; predictive monitoring; BPM; digital transformation; machine learning; operations research.

Abstract

The paper investigates intelligent planning and optimization systems for enterprise business processes as an element of modern process management. Business process intellectualization is interpreted as a change in the management cycle logic: from regulation and execution control toward data, deviation diagnostics, decision outcome forecasting, and computationally grounded selection of optimal actions under resource, time, and quality constraints. The conceptual apparatus is systematized: enterprise business process, process approach, process planning and optimization are differentiated; distinctions between automation systems, expert systems, and intelligent systems are established; differences between BPM, ERP, and APS systems are clarified. The evolution of the BPM paradigm – from workflow systems and RPA to iBPMS and hyperautomation – is examined. Three intelligence contours are substantiated: deviation diagnostics (process mining), risk prediction (predictive monitoring), and prescriptive intervention recommendations. Intelligent planning methods are analyzed: operations research, machine learning, reinforcement learning, and the role of process mining as a diagnostic bridge between BPM and optimization. Organizational and economic implementation effects are identified alongside key success conditions – data governance, process ownership, and a continuous improvement culture. The sociotechnical nature of AI/BPM project failures is substantiated. The specifics of the Ukrainian context are investigated: resilience under wartime conditions as the primary digitalization driver, SME investment constraints, cloud-modular architecture, and EU integration requirements under the AI Act and Data Act. The authors' position: the key strategy is building a managed process-data foundation on which AI and OR methods become tools for resilience and EU integration compliance. Practical readiness criterion: if a process is unmeasured and has no owner, it cannot be optimized – only its chaos can be automated.

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Lopatka, S., & Lopatka, O. (2026). Intelligent systems for planning and optimizing enterprise business processes. Achievements of the Economy: Prospects and Innovations, (26). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19124239